Preview
IB DP Global Politics — Thematic study: Development and sustainability | SL | Development and Sustainability
📋 What You Will Learn
- Define sustainable development and distinguish it from conventional development models
- Explain the three pillars of sustainable development (economic, social, environmental) and their tensions
- Describe the key debates around sustainable development, including growth vs degrowth, equity, and intergenerational justice
- Analyse the role of states, IGOs, civil society and corporations in pursuing or obstructing sustainable development
- Compare how different theoretical perspectives interpret sustainable development and its politics
- Evaluate whether the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent a meaningful global commitment or a political compromise
🔍 Guiding Question Can economic growth and environmental sustainability be genuinely reconciled, or does the pursuit of development as we know it inevitably undermine the conditions for future human flourishing?
🌍 Why This Matters In 2023, global average temperatures exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels for the first time in recorded history, while the UN reported that progress on the Sustainable Development Goals had stalled or reversed across most indicators. At the same time, over 700 million people remain in extreme poverty. The tension between lifting people out of poverty and protecting the planet's life-support systems is the defining political challenge of this generation.
🔑 Key Concept Link Sustainable development sits at the intersection of all four key concepts. Power determines who sets the development agenda and who bears its costs. Sovereignty is invoked when states resist external environmental conditions on their development choices. Legitimacy is at stake when communities ask who has the right to decide how resources are used. Interdependence is the reason sustainable development cannot be solved by any single state — climate, biodiversity and poverty cross all borders. Return to these links throughout.
What Is Development — and Why Is It Contested?
Before we can understand "sustainable" development, we must ask what "development" itself means. The word carries enormous political weight: it implies a direction of travel, a destination, and a judgement about who is "ahead" and who is "behind." These assumptions are deeply contested.
📖 Definition — Development Development refers to processes of change that improve human well-being, expand capabilities and opportunities, and increase material living standards. It is contested because different actors prioritise different dimensions — economic growth, political freedom, social equality, cultural integrity, or ecological health — and because the dominant model has historically reflected the interests and experiences of wealthy industrialised states.
Why the concept is politically loaded
- The dominant post-WWII model equated development with GDP growth and industrialisation — a model shaped by Western experience and Cold War geopolitics.
- Critics from the Global South (dependency theorists, postcolonial scholars) argued this model reproduced inequality and dependency rather than genuine progress.
- The Human Development Index (HDI), introduced by the UNDP in 1990, broadened the concept to include health and education — a deliberate political challenge to GDP-only thinking.
- Indigenous and feminist scholars further challenged development as a concept that marginalises non-Western knowledge systems and ignores unpaid care work.
- The debate is not merely academic: it shapes which policies receive international funding, which states are labelled "developing," and who gets to define progress.
Defining Sustainable Development
The concept of sustainable development emerged from growing recognition in the 1970s and 1980s that economic growth was degrading the ecological systems on which all human activity depends. The landmark definition came from the Brundtland Commission in 1987.
📖 Definition —