Preview
IB DP Global Politics — Thematic study: Rights and justice | SL | Rights and Justice
📋 What You Will Learn
- Define individual rights and collective rights, and explain the distinction between them
- Describe the main categories of rights (civil, political, economic, social, cultural, group/solidarity rights) and their historical development
- Explain the key tensions and trade-offs between individual and collective rights claims
- Analyse how different actors — states, IGOs, civil society, communities — make and contest rights claims
- Compare how different theoretical perspectives (liberalism, communitarianism, postcolonialism, feminism) interpret the relationship between individual and collective rights
- Evaluate the claim that individual rights and collective rights are fundamentally in conflict
🔍 Guiding Question When the rights of an individual clash with the rights or interests of a community, group, or state, whose claim should take priority — and who has the authority to decide?
🌍 Why This Matters In 2023, the Canadian government faced renewed legal challenges from First Nations communities asserting collective rights to land and self-determination under Treaty obligations — rights that sometimes conflicted with individual property rights and federal resource-development decisions. The dispute illustrates a tension that runs through every rights system: does the group or the individual come first?
🔑 Key Concept Link This topic is anchored in rights and justice , but it directly engages all four key concepts. Power determines whose rights claims are heard and enforced. Legitimacy shapes which rights frameworks are accepted as authoritative. Sovereignty defines which authority — state, community, or international body — can adjudicate competing claims. Interdependence means that rights violations in one place increasingly draw responses from actors elsewhere. Return to these links throughout.
What Are Rights?
Before examining the tension between individual and collective rights, it is essential to understand what a "right" is and why the concept is contested. Rights are not simply things people want — they are entitlements that impose obligations on others to act, refrain from acting, or provide something.
📖 Definition — Rights Rights are entitlements that individuals or groups hold, which impose corresponding duties on others (individuals, states, or institutions) to respect, protect, or fulfil them. Rights may be grounded in law (legal rights), in moral reasoning (moral or natural rights), or in political recognition (political rights).
Rights claims are inherently political: they assert that someone is owed something and that someone else is obligated to provide it. This makes rights a site of power struggles — over who counts as a rights-holder, what the right entails, and who enforces it.
Generations of rights
- First-generation rights (civil and political): protect the individual from state interference — freedom of speech, assembly, religion, fair trial, voting. Rooted in Enlightenment liberalism; codified in the ICCPR (1966).
- Second-generation rights (economic, social, cultural): require positive state action — rights to work, education, healthcare, housing. Codified in the ICESCR (1966); often contested as aspirational rather than enforceable.
- Third-generation rights (solidarity/group rights): held by peoples or communities — the right to development, a clean environment, self-determination, peace. Contested: critics argue only individuals can hold rights; proponents argue communities have distinct interests that individuals cannot protect alone.
📌 Note — The "Generations" Framework The "three generations" model (associated with Karel Vasak) is a useful organising tool but is contested. Critics argue it implies a hierarchy — as if civil/political rights are "real" and social/economic rights are secondary — which reflects a Western liberal bias. Many states in the Global South and socialist traditions have historically prioritised