Preview
Poverty as a Global Political Challenge
IB DP Global Politics — HL extension: Global political challenges | HL | Poverty
📋 What You Will Learn
- Define poverty in its multiple dimensions — absolute, relative, and multidimensional — and explain why the definition is contested
- Describe the key actors and institutions shaping global responses to poverty
- Explain the structural causes of poverty at global, national and local levels
- Analyse how poverty intersects with power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence
- Compare theoretical perspectives (realist, liberal, postcolonial, feminist) on the causes of and solutions to poverty
- Evaluate the effectiveness of major policy responses, including aid, debt relief, trade reform and social protection
- Recommend a course of action to address a specific poverty-related political challenge
🔍 Guiding Question Is global poverty primarily a failure of political will and power, a structural consequence of the international economic order, or an inevitable result of local governance failures — and does the answer determine what should be done about it?
🌍 Why This Matters In 2022, the World Bank estimated that the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent economic shocks pushed an additional 75–95 million people into extreme poverty, reversing decades of progress and exposing how fragile poverty reduction gains can be. At the same time, the ten richest individuals in the world saw their wealth double during the pandemic. The political question is not simply "how much poverty exists?" but "who benefits from its persistence, who has the power to change it, and why haven't they?"
🔑 Key Concept Link Poverty engages all four key concepts simultaneously. Power determines who sets the terms of the global economy and who is excluded from its benefits. Sovereignty is tested when international institutions impose conditions on indebted states. Legitimacy is undermined when governments fail to meet the basic needs of their populations. Interdependence means that poverty in one region generates migration, instability and health crises that affect others — making poverty a genuinely global political challenge, not merely a domestic welfare problem.
What Is Poverty? Contested Definitions
Before any political response is possible, actors must agree on what poverty is — and they do not. The definition chosen shapes who is counted as poor, which solutions seem appropriate, and which actors bear responsibility. This makes the definition of poverty itself a political act.
📖 Definition — Absolute Poverty Absolute poverty refers to a condition in which individuals lack the minimum resources necessary to sustain basic human life — typically measured by the World Bank's international poverty line, currently set at living on less than US$2.15 per day (2022, 2017 PPP). It focuses on a fixed threshold of material deprivation regardless of social context.
📖 Definition — Relative Poverty Relative poverty is defined in relation to the living standards of a given society — typically households earning below 50–60% of the national median income. A person may be above the absolute poverty line yet still be relatively poor and socially excluded in a wealthy country. This definition highlights inequality and social participation, not just survival.
📖 Definition — Multidimensional Poverty Multidimensional poverty, measured by the UN Development Programme's Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), captures deprivation across health, education and living standards — not income alone. A person is considered multidimensionally poor if they are deprived in a weighted combination of indicators such as nutrition, child mortality, years of schooling, cooking fuel, sanitation and electricity. This approach recognises that poverty is about capability deprivation, not just income.
Why the definition is political
- Setting the poverty line at $2.15/day rather than $10/day (a "societal" threshold proposed by some economists) dramatically changes the count of